Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 63(4): e184-e186, 2021 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1153280

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an empirical olfactory test to identify COVID-19 cases during a workplace entrance screening. METHOD: An active screening for olfactory dysfunction using water and vinegar was conducted in April to June 2020 among 4120 meat packing workers in Latin America. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the active olfactory screening examination were 41.2% and 85.3%, respectively, using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests as a gold standard. 10.6% of employees who tested positive for COVID-19 had an olfactory dysfunction as their only symptom. These individuals would not have been identified with standard workplace screening measures including temperature screening. CONCLUSION: Active screening for olfactory dysfunction may serve as a valuable tool to both identify potential COVID-19 infections and exclude those who do not have infection and should be a part of parallel algorithm combined with standard workplace entrance screening procedures.


Subject(s)
Anosmia/diagnosis , COVID-19/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Workplace , Acetic Acid , Anosmia/physiopathology , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Meat-Packing Industry , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL